Proofpoint vs Tessian -- Email Security Compared

Proofpoint vs Tessian

Tessian approaches email security from the human layer perspective, uniquely combining inbound threat detection with outbound misdirected email prevention and accidental data loss protection. Its ability to detect when a user is about to send sensitive data to the wrong recipient is a capability that Proofpoint's gateway model does not natively address in the same way. Now that Tessian has been acquired by Proofpoint, its technology is being integrated into the Proofpoint platform. As a standalone comparison, Tessian fills specific human risk gaps while Proofpoint provides comprehensive end-to-end email security.

The Verdict

Choose Tessian if preventing misdirected emails and accidental data loss is a critical requirement that your current email security does not address, or if you want behavioral AI coaching for users. Choose Proofpoint if you need a comprehensive, enterprise-grade email security platform with full threat protection, archiving, and compliance. Note that Tessian's technology is being absorbed into Proofpoint, so its standalone future is uncertain.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureTessianProofpoint
Inbound Threat DetectionBehavioral AI for social engineeringFull-spectrum threat detection
Misdirected Email PreventionAI-powered wrong recipient detectionNot natively available
DLP ApproachBehavioral (accidental and intentional)Policy-based keyword and pattern matching
User CoachingReal-time in-context coachingPost-incident awareness training
Email ArchivingNot availableEnterprise archiving with compliance
DeploymentAPI-based, no MX changesMX record redirect (gateway model)
Platform ScopeFocused human layer securityComprehensive email security platform
Vendor StabilityAcquired by Proofpoint — roadmap uncertainEstablished independent vendor

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Tessian when:

  • +Preventing accidental data loss from misdirected emails is a key concern
  • +You want behavioral AI that coaches users in real time about risky email actions
  • +You need outbound email protection beyond traditional DLP keyword rules
  • +You want to address the human error dimension of email security
  • +You are evaluating pre-acquisition Tessian capabilities for your email security stack

Choose Proofpoint when:

  • +You need comprehensive inbound email threat protection across all attack types
  • +You require email archiving and regulatory compliance capabilities
  • +You want a single platform covering threats, DLP, archiving, and training
  • +You need proven enterprise-scale email security with global threat intelligence
  • +You prefer a vendor with long-term product stability and roadmap clarity

Pros & Cons Comparison

Tessian

Pros

  • +Unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well
  • +Behavioral AI catches threats that gateway solutions miss
  • +Real-time coaching helps users make better security decisions
  • +Prevents both intentional exfiltration and accidental data loss
  • +API-based deployment with no MX record changes required

Cons

  • Now part of Proofpoint — future as standalone product uncertain
  • Not a full email gateway replacement
  • Narrower threat coverage than comprehensive email security platforms
  • Behavioral models require learning period to reduce initial false positives
  • No email archiving or compliance capabilities

Proofpoint

Pros

  • +Industry-leading threat detection efficacy with deep threat intelligence
  • +Comprehensive platform covering protection, compliance, and awareness
  • +Strong business email compromise detection using behavioral analysis
  • +Extensive email archiving and regulatory compliance capabilities
  • +Large threat intelligence network from protecting Fortune 100 companies

Cons

  • Premium pricing puts it out of reach for smaller organizations
  • Complex deployment and administration for full platform
  • Email archiving interface can feel dated compared to newer tools
  • Bundled licensing model may force purchase of unneeded modules
  • Can generate false positives on legitimate marketing and bulk email

Proofpoint vs Tessian FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Proofpoint and Tessian.

What is the main difference between Proofpoint and Tessian?

Tessian approaches email security from the human layer perspective, uniquely combining inbound threat detection with outbound misdirected email prevention and accidental data loss protection. Its ability to detect when a user is about to send sensitive data to the wrong recipient is a capability that Proofpoint's gateway model does not natively address in the same way. Now that Tessian has been acquired by Proofpoint, its technology is being integrated into the Proofpoint platform. As a standalone comparison, Tessian fills specific human risk gaps while Proofpoint provides comprehensive end-to-end email security.

Is Tessian better than Proofpoint?

Choose Tessian if preventing misdirected emails and accidental data loss is a critical requirement that your current email security does not address, or if you want behavioral AI coaching for users. Choose Proofpoint if you need a comprehensive, enterprise-grade email security platform with full threat protection, archiving, and compliance. Note that Tessian's technology is being absorbed into Proofpoint, so its standalone future is uncertain.

How much does Tessian cost compared to Proofpoint?

Tessian pricing: Custom pricing / per-user licensing. Proofpoint pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing. Tessian's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Proofpoint uses per-user subscription pricing.

Can I migrate from Proofpoint to Tessian?

Yes, you can migrate from Proofpoint to Tessian. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.

Related Comparisons & Guides