Proofpoint vs Mimecast -- Email Security Compared
Mimecast is the closest direct competitor to Proofpoint, offering a similarly comprehensive email security platform that spans threat protection, archiving, and awareness training. Mimecast differentiates with its email continuity feature, which keeps mail flowing during Exchange or Microsoft 365 outages. Proofpoint generally leads in threat detection efficacy and threat intelligence depth, particularly against sophisticated BEC and targeted phishing campaigns.
Choose Mimecast if email continuity is critical and you want a well-rounded platform that is somewhat easier to administer. Choose Proofpoint if you face sophisticated, targeted email threats and need the deepest threat intelligence, behavioral BEC detection, and automated incident response capabilities.
| Feature | Mimecast | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Threat Detection | Strong multi-layer detection | Industry-leading detection with deep threat intel |
| Email Continuity | Built-in email failover | No native email continuity |
| BEC Protection | Impersonation detection | Advanced behavioral analysis and AI |
| Email Archiving | Cloud archiving with search | Enterprise archiving with compliance workflows |
| DMARC Management | Built-in DMARC analyzer | Available but less prominent |
| Threat Intelligence | Good threat feeds | Deep attribution and campaign tracking |
| Awareness Training | Integrated training module | Comprehensive training with ThreatSim |
| Incident Response | Manual remediation tools | TRAP automated response workflows |
Common questions about choosing between Proofpoint and Mimecast.
Mimecast is the closest direct competitor to Proofpoint, offering a similarly comprehensive email security platform that spans threat protection, archiving, and awareness training. Mimecast differentiates with its email continuity feature, which keeps mail flowing during Exchange or Microsoft 365 outages. Proofpoint generally leads in threat detection efficacy and threat intelligence depth, particularly against sophisticated BEC and targeted phishing campaigns.
Choose Mimecast if email continuity is critical and you want a well-rounded platform that is somewhat easier to administer. Choose Proofpoint if you face sophisticated, targeted email threats and need the deepest threat intelligence, behavioral BEC detection, and automated incident response capabilities.
Mimecast pricing: Custom pricing / per-user licensing. Proofpoint pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing. Mimecast's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Proofpoint uses per-user subscription pricing.
Yes, you can migrate from Proofpoint to Mimecast. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Microsoft's native email security for Microsoft 365 with XDR integration
ComparisonAI-powered email security platform specializing in behavioral detection of social engineering attacks
ComparisonEmail threat protection platform available as gateway appliance or cloud service
ComparisonEnterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
CategoryCompare the best enterprise email gateway alternatives to Proofpoint in 2026. Mimecast, Cisco Secure Email, Barracuda — detection, archiving, pricing, and features compared.
CategoryCompare the best cloud email security alternatives to Proofpoint in 2026. Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Trend Micro, Mimecast — cloud-native protection, XDR integration, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Proofpoint alternatives for phishing prevention in 2026. Abnormal Security, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender, IRONSCALES — detection, deployment, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Proofpoint alternatives for BEC protection in 2026. Abnormal Security, Tessian, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender — behavioral AI, detection rates, and pricing compared.