Enterprise Email Security Gateways -- Proofpoint Alternatives
Enterprise email security gateways are the traditional approach to email protection, sitting inline in the mail flow to inspect, filter, and block threats before they reach the inbox. These platforms handle the full spectrum of email threats including spam, malware, phishing, BEC, and data loss. They typically require MX record changes to route email through the gateway and offer the broadest feature sets including archiving, encryption, DLP, and compliance. These are the most direct alternatives to Proofpoint's core secure email gateway product.
Custom pricing / per-user licensing
The closest direct competitor to Proofpoint offering a similarly comprehensive platform with threat protection, archiving, awareness training, and the unique differentiator of email continuity for maintaining mail flow during outages. Best for organizations wanting a full-featured alternative with slightly easier administration.
Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing
Strong choice for organizations already invested in the Cisco security ecosystem, with deep SecureX integration and Talos threat intelligence. Offers both cloud and on-premises deployment options. Best for Cisco-centric enterprises wanting vendor consolidation.
From $3.60/user/month / appliance pricing varies
Provides solid email protection at a significantly lower price point than Proofpoint and Mimecast. Available as both cloud service and on-premises appliance. Best for small-to-mid-market organizations with standard email security needs and budget constraints.
Cloud email security platform with threat protection, archiving, and continuity
Custom pricing / per-user licensing
Mid-to-large enterprises wanting a unified email security, archiving, and continuity platform with strong API integrations
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing
Cisco-centric enterprises wanting email security that integrates with their existing Cisco networking and security stack
Email threat protection platform available as gateway appliance or cloud service
From $3.60/user/month / appliance pricing varies
Small-to-mid-market organizations wanting effective email security at a lower price point than Proofpoint or Mimecast
Compare all 3 Proofpoint alternatives side-by-side across pricing, deployment, and key capabilities.
| Feature | Mimecast 4.3/5 | Cisco Secure Email 4/5 | Barracuda Email Security 4.1/5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Per-user subscription | Per-user subscription or appliance license | Per-user subscription or appliance license |
| Open Source | -- | -- | -- |
| Cloud-Hosted | + | + | + |
| Self-Hosted | -- | + | + |
| Best For | Mid-to-large enterprises wanting a unified email security, archiving, and continuity platform with strong API integrations | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting email security that integrates with their existing Cisco networking and security stack | Small-to-mid-market organizations wanting effective email security at a lower price point than Proofpoint or Mimecast |
| Key Features |
|
|
|
| Website | Visit | Visit | Visit |
Proofpoint and Mimecast consistently rank highest in independent threat detection evaluations, with Proofpoint generally holding a slight edge for advanced targeted threats and BEC attacks. Cisco Secure Email is strong for malware detection backed by Talos intelligence. Barracuda provides solid protection for standard threats but is less effective against sophisticated, targeted attacks. For organizations facing advanced threat actors, Proofpoint and Mimecast are the top choices.
Yes, Mimecast is the most direct replacement for Proofpoint. It offers comparable capabilities across threat protection, email archiving, and security awareness training, plus email continuity that Proofpoint does not offer. Organizations that switch from Proofpoint to Mimecast typically report similar protection with somewhat easier day-to-day administration. The main areas where Proofpoint may still lead are deep threat intelligence, BEC detection accuracy, and automated incident response workflows.
Gateways provide the broadest protection by inspecting all email in-line before delivery, covering spam, malware, phishing, and data loss in a single platform. API-based tools deploy faster and detect social engineering attacks better, but do not provide full email security on their own. Most enterprises benefit from a gateway as the primary layer with an optional API-based tool for advanced BEC detection. If you are a smaller organization that only needs phishing protection, an API-based tool may be sufficient.
Barracuda is often the better choice for small businesses due to its significantly lower pricing, simpler administration, and bundled PhishLine training at no extra cost. Proofpoint's enterprise-grade capabilities — deep threat intelligence, advanced BEC detection, and sophisticated compliance workflows — are designed for large organizations facing targeted threats. Small businesses facing standard email threats will find Barracuda provides effective protection at a fraction of the cost.
Cloud email security platform with threat protection, archiving, and continuity
ComparisonEnterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonEmail threat protection platform available as gateway appliance or cloud service
CategoryCompare the best AI-powered email security alternatives to Proofpoint in 2026. Abnormal Security, IRONSCALES, Tessian — behavioral detection, BEC protection, and pricing compared.
CategoryCompare the best cloud email security alternatives to Proofpoint in 2026. Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Trend Micro, Mimecast — cloud-native protection, XDR integration, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Proofpoint alternatives for phishing prevention in 2026. Abnormal Security, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender, IRONSCALES — detection, deployment, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Proofpoint alternatives for BEC protection in 2026. Abnormal Security, Tessian, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender — behavioral AI, detection rates, and pricing compared.