Zscaler vs Cato Networks -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared
Cato Networks offers the most architecturally pure single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone that delivers predictable performance. Zscaler provides deeper security inspection, a larger global network, and more mature CASB/DLP capabilities, but lacks native SD-WAN and operates over the public internet rather than a private backbone. Cato wins on architectural simplicity and converged networking+security; Zscaler wins on security depth and proven enterprise scale.
Choose Cato Networks if you want the simplest, most architecturally coherent SASE platform with integrated SD-WAN and a private global backbone for predictable performance. Choose Zscaler if you need the deepest security inspection capabilities, the most mature ZTNA for large-scale deployments, and advanced CASB/DLP features for cloud application governance.
| Feature | Cato Networks | Zscaler |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Single-vendor built from scratch, private backbone | Cloud-native proxy over public internet |
| SD-WAN | Native integrated SD-WAN | No native SD-WAN capability |
| Global Network | 80+ PoPs on private backbone | 150+ DCs on public internet |
| Secure Web Gateway | Integrated SWG with TLS inspection | Industry-leading SWG depth |
| ZTNA | Built-in ZTNA/SDP | ZPA — proven at enterprise scale |
| Management | Single unified management console | Separate ZIA/ZPA portals |
| Threat Detection | Managed detection and response (MDR) | ThreatLabz + cloud sandboxing |
| CASB/DLP | Growing CASB and DLP capabilities | Advanced CASB and enterprise DLP |
Common questions about choosing between Zscaler and Cato Networks.
Cato Networks offers the most architecturally pure single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone that delivers predictable performance. Zscaler provides deeper security inspection, a larger global network, and more mature CASB/DLP capabilities, but lacks native SD-WAN and operates over the public internet rather than a private backbone. Cato wins on architectural simplicity and converged networking+security; Zscaler wins on security depth and proven enterprise scale.
Choose Cato Networks if you want the simplest, most architecturally coherent SASE platform with integrated SD-WAN and a private global backbone for predictable performance. Choose Zscaler if you need the deepest security inspection capabilities, the most mature ZTNA for large-scale deployments, and advanced CASB/DLP features for cloud application governance.
Cato Networks pricing: Custom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth. Zscaler pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user subscription. Cato Networks's pricing model is per-site and per-user annual subscription, while Zscaler uses per-user annual subscription pricing.
Yes, you can migrate from Zscaler to Cato Networks. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility
ComparisonDeveloper-friendly zero trust platform built on Cloudflare's global Anycast network
ComparisonEnterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security
ComparisonConverged SASE platform powered by FortiOS with competitive pricing and integrated SD-WAN
CategoryCompare the best cloud-native SASE alternatives to Zscaler in 2026. Netskope, Cloudflare Zero Trust, Cato Networks — features, pricing, and architecture compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Zscaler alternatives for secure web gateway in 2026. Netskope, Cloudflare, Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cato — SWG features, TLS inspection, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Zscaler alternatives for VPN replacement and zero trust network access in 2026. ZTNA features, deployment, pricing, and remote access capabilities compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Zscaler alternatives for branch office security in 2026. Cato Networks, Fortinet FortiSASE, Palo Alto Prisma, Cisco — SD-WAN, security, and branch connectivity compared.