CyberArk Conjur vs Keeper (Business) -- Enterprise Compared
CyberArk Conjur vs Keeper (Business)
CyberArk Conjur and Keeper (Business) are both enterprise solutions. CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform, while Keeper (Business) zero-knowledge enterprise password and secrets management with dark web monitoring. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security is your priority and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements. Choose Keeper (Business) if strong zero-knowledge security architecture with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance matters most and compliance-focused enterprises needing zero-knowledge security and dark web monitoring.
Used CyberArk Conjur or Keeper (Business)? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Keeper (Business) | CyberArk Conjur |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Business Starter from $2/user/month / Business from $3.75/user/month / Enterprise custom pricing | Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request |
| Pricing Model | Per-user | Enterprise license |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Best For | Compliance-focused enterprises needing zero-knowledge security and dark web monitoring | Large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements |
| Policy-as-code access control | Not available | Supported |
| Machine identity management | Not available | Supported |
| CI/CD pipeline integration | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Keeper (Business) when:
- +You value strong zero-knowledge security architecture with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance
- +You value breachWatch provides proactive dark web credential monitoring
- +You value granular admin controls and enforcement policies
- +You want to avoid complex setup and configuration
- +You want to avoid enterprise pricing can be high
Choose CyberArk Conjur when:
- +You value enterprise-grade security
- +You value open-source community edition
- +You value strong compliance support
- +You want to avoid many features are paid add-ons beyond the base price
- +You want to avoid no self-hosted deployment option
Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure
We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.
Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency
- +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
- +Secrets never leave your environment
- +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
- –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
- –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
- –Newer platform with smaller market presence
Other CyberArk Conjur Alternatives
Secrets automation and password management for teams and CI/CD
Open-source enterprise password manager with self-hosting and transparent security
Widely adopted enterprise password management with extensive SSO and MFA integration
Business password management with built-in VPN, phishing protection, and SSO integration
Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform
Developer-first universal secrets management platform
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
Pros & Cons Comparison
Keeper (Business)
Pros
- +Strong zero-knowledge security architecture with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance
- +BreachWatch provides proactive dark web credential monitoring
- +Granular admin controls and enforcement policies
- +Integrated secrets management and privileged access in one platform
- +FedRAMP authorized for government use
Cons
- –Many features are paid add-ons beyond the base price
- –No self-hosted deployment option
- –User interface can feel dated compared to newer competitors
- –Dark web monitoring (BreachWatch) requires separate add-on purchase
CyberArk Conjur
Pros
- +Enterprise-grade security
- +Open-source community edition
- +Strong compliance support
- +Deep DevOps toolchain integration
Cons
- –Complex setup and configuration
- –Enterprise pricing can be high
- –Steeper learning curve
- –Requires CyberArk ecosystem for full value
Sources & References
- CyberArk Conjur — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Keeper (Business) — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Keeper (Business) Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Keeper (Business) Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Keeper (Business) Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Market Guide for Secrets Management[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Secrets Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
- NIST SP 800-57: Recommendation for Key Management[Government Standard]
CyberArk Conjur vs Keeper (Business) FAQ
Common questions about choosing between CyberArk Conjur and Keeper (Business).
What is the main difference between CyberArk Conjur and Keeper (Business)?
CyberArk Conjur and Keeper (Business) are both enterprise solutions. CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform, while Keeper (Business) zero-knowledge enterprise password and secrets management with dark web monitoring. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Keeper (Business) better than CyberArk Conjur?
Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security is your priority and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements. Choose Keeper (Business) if strong zero-knowledge security architecture with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance matters most and compliance-focused enterprises needing zero-knowledge security and dark web monitoring.
How much does Keeper (Business) cost compared to CyberArk Conjur?
Keeper (Business) pricing: Business Starter from $2/user/month / Business from $3.75/user/month / Enterprise custom pricing. CyberArk Conjur pricing: Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request. Keeper (Business)'s pricing model is per-user, while CyberArk Conjur uses enterprise license pricing.
Can I migrate from CyberArk Conjur to Keeper (Business)?
Yes, you can migrate from CyberArk Conjur to Keeper (Business). The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Keeper (Business) Alternatives
Zero-knowledge enterprise password and secrets management with dark web monitoring
ComparisonDashlane (Business) vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonAzure Key Vault vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonBitwarden (Business) vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonGoogle Cloud Secret Manager vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonHashiCorp Vault vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonInfisical vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonKeeper (Business) vs CyberArk Conjur
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform