Google Cloud Secret Manager vs CyberArk Conjur -- Cloud-Native Compared

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs CyberArk Conjur

Google Cloud Secret Manager and CyberArk Conjur are both cloud-native solutions. Google Cloud Secret Manager gCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit, while CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if simple and intuitive API is your priority and teams running workloads on Google Cloud Platform. Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security matters most and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements.

Related Comparisons
CyberArk Conjur AlternativesAzure Key Vault vs Google Cloud Secret ManagerSplitSecure vs Google Cloud Secret ManagerAkeyless vs Google Cloud Secret ManagerDelinea Secret Server vs Google Cloud Secret ManagerGoogle Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless

Used Google Cloud Secret Manager or CyberArk Conjur? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureCyberArk ConjurGoogle Cloud Secret Manager
PricingOpen source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on requestFree for 6 active versions + $0.06/10k access ops
Pricing ModelEnterprise licensePer-operation
Open SourceYesNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud
Best ForLarge enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirementsTeams running workloads on Google Cloud Platform
IAM-based access controlNot availableSupported
Customer-managed encryption keysNot availableSupported
Regional and multi-regional replicationNot availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose CyberArk Conjur when:

  • +You value enterprise-grade security
  • +You value open-source community edition
  • +You value strong compliance support
  • +You want to avoid gCP lock-in
  • +You want to avoid fewer rotation features than AWS

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager when:

  • +You value simple and intuitive API
  • +You value generous free tier
  • +You value strong GCP integration
  • +You want to avoid complex setup and configuration
  • +You want to avoid enterprise pricing can be high

Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • –Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted
View Profile

Other Google Cloud Secret Manager Alternatives

Akeyless logo
Akeyless

SaaS-based zero-knowledge secrets management platform

HashiCorp Vault logo
HashiCorp Vault

Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform

AWS Secrets Manager logo
AWS Secrets Manager

Native AWS secrets management service with automatic rotation

Azure Key Vault logo
Azure Key Vault

Microsoft Azure's managed secrets, keys, and certificate service

Doppler logo
Doppler

Developer-first universal secrets management platform

Infisical logo
Infisical

Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams

Delinea Secret Server logo
Delinea Secret Server

Enterprise password and privileged credential vault

Pros & Cons Comparison

CyberArk Conjur

Pros

  • +Enterprise-grade security
  • +Open-source community edition
  • +Strong compliance support
  • +Deep DevOps toolchain integration

Cons

  • –Complex setup and configuration
  • –Enterprise pricing can be high
  • –Steeper learning curve
  • –Requires CyberArk ecosystem for full value

Google Cloud Secret Manager

Pros

  • +Simple and intuitive API
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Strong GCP integration
  • +Automatic versioning built-in

Cons

  • –GCP lock-in
  • –Fewer rotation features than AWS
  • –Smaller ecosystem
  • –No self-hosted option

Sources & References

  1. Google Cloud Secret Manager — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. CyberArk Conjur — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. CyberArk Conjur Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. CyberArk Conjur Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. CyberArk Conjur Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Market Guide for CNAPP 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Cloud Workload Security 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. IDC MarketScape: CNAPP 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Cloud Security Alliance: Cloud Controls Matrix[Industry Framework]
  13. Gartner Peer Insights: CNAPP[Peer Reviews]

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs CyberArk Conjur FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Google Cloud Secret Manager and CyberArk Conjur.

What is the main difference between Google Cloud Secret Manager and CyberArk Conjur?

Google Cloud Secret Manager and CyberArk Conjur are both cloud-native solutions. Google Cloud Secret Manager gCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit, while CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is CyberArk Conjur better than Google Cloud Secret Manager?

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager if simple and intuitive API is your priority and teams running workloads on Google Cloud Platform. Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security matters most and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements.

How much does CyberArk Conjur cost compared to Google Cloud Secret Manager?

CyberArk Conjur pricing: Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request. Google Cloud Secret Manager pricing: Free for 6 active versions + $0.06/10k access ops. CyberArk Conjur's pricing model is enterprise license, while Google Cloud Secret Manager uses per-operation pricing.

Can I migrate from Google Cloud Secret Manager to CyberArk Conjur?

Yes, you can migrate from Google Cloud Secret Manager to CyberArk Conjur. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.

Related Comparisons & Guides

Product Hub

CyberArk Conjur Alternatives

Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform

Comparison

Azure Key Vault vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

GCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit

Comparison

SplitSecure vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

GCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit

Comparison

Akeyless vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

GCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit

Comparison

Delinea Secret Server vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

GCP-native secrets storage with versioning and audit

Comparison

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless

SaaS-based zero-knowledge secrets management platform

Comparison

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs HashiCorp Vault

Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform

Comparison

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs AWS Secrets Manager

Native AWS secrets management service with automatic rotation