Varonis vs Forcepoint DLP -- Data Security & Governance Compared

Varonis vs Forcepoint DLP

Forcepoint DLP focuses on preventing data loss through active policy enforcement across endpoints, networks, and cloud channels, while Varonis focuses on data access governance, insider threat detection, and understanding who has access to what data. The two platforms address different aspects of data security — Forcepoint blocks data exfiltration in real time, while Varonis provides visibility and governance over data access patterns.

The Verdict

Choose Forcepoint DLP if you need active data loss prevention that blocks exfiltration across endpoints, network, email, and cloud channels with risk-adaptive enforcement. Choose Varonis if you need data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and automated permission remediation to proactively reduce data risk rather than reactively block exfiltration.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureForcepoint DLPVaronis
Data Loss PreventionActive multi-channel DLP enforcementAlert-based monitoring with access controls
Data Access GovernanceNot availableFull permission mapping and least privilege
Insider Threat ApproachRisk-adaptive policy enforcementUEBA with behavioral baselines and anomaly detection
Content Classifiers1,700+ pre-built classifiers400+ classification patterns
Endpoint ProtectionEndpoint DLP agent with blockingLimited endpoint monitoring
Policy EnforcementBlock, encrypt, quarantine actionsAlert, notify, report actions
OCR/Image AnalysisBuilt-in OCR and image scanningLimited image content analysis
Platform FocusData loss prevention and enforcementData access governance and insider threat

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Forcepoint DLP when:

  • +You need active DLP enforcement that blocks data exfiltration across endpoints, network, and cloud
  • +Risk-adaptive policies that dynamically adjust enforcement based on user behavior are important
  • +You need multi-channel coverage including email DLP, web DLP, and endpoint DLP
  • +You require OCR and image analysis to detect sensitive data in non-text formats
  • +You want a mature DLP platform with 1,700+ pre-built content classifiers

Choose Varonis when:

  • +You need to understand and govern who has access to sensitive data, not just prevent its exfiltration
  • +Data access governance with permission mapping and least privilege enforcement is your priority
  • +You want insider threat detection through behavioral analytics rather than DLP policy violations
  • +You need to clean up overexposed data and stale permissions proactively
  • +You want to monitor data access patterns across file servers, databases, and cloud storage

Pros & Cons Comparison

Forcepoint DLP

Pros

  • +Comprehensive DLP coverage across all exfiltration channels
  • +Risk-Adaptive Protection adjusts enforcement based on user risk level
  • +1,700+ pre-built classifiers for sensitive data identification
  • +Strong incident management and remediation workflows
  • +Long track record in enterprise DLP deployments

Cons

  • Complex deployment and ongoing policy management
  • Does not provide data access governance or permission analysis
  • Endpoint agent can impact system performance
  • Licensing costs are significant for large user populations
  • Legacy architecture in some components can feel dated

Varonis

Pros

  • +Deep visibility into file and data access permissions across hybrid environments
  • +Powerful insider threat detection with behavioral analytics
  • +Automated remediation of overexposed data and stale permissions
  • +Broad coverage across file servers, SharePoint, Exchange, cloud apps, and databases
  • +Mature platform with 20 years of data security expertise

Cons

  • Enterprise pricing can be significant for large deployments
  • Initial deployment and permission scanning can be time-intensive
  • Agent-based architecture adds infrastructure overhead
  • Steep learning curve for advanced configuration and policy tuning
  • Cloud-native coverage has historically lagged behind on-premises capabilities

Varonis vs Forcepoint DLP FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Varonis and Forcepoint DLP.

What is the main difference between Varonis and Forcepoint DLP?

Forcepoint DLP focuses on preventing data loss through active policy enforcement across endpoints, networks, and cloud channels, while Varonis focuses on data access governance, insider threat detection, and understanding who has access to what data. The two platforms address different aspects of data security — Forcepoint blocks data exfiltration in real time, while Varonis provides visibility and governance over data access patterns.

Is Forcepoint DLP better than Varonis?

Choose Forcepoint DLP if you need active data loss prevention that blocks exfiltration across endpoints, network, email, and cloud channels with risk-adaptive enforcement. Choose Varonis if you need data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and automated permission remediation to proactively reduce data risk rather than reactively block exfiltration.

How much does Forcepoint DLP cost compared to Varonis?

Forcepoint DLP pricing: Custom enterprise pricing based on user count. Varonis pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-TB licensing. Forcepoint DLP's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Varonis uses subscription (per-user or per-tb) pricing.

Can I migrate from Varonis to Forcepoint DLP?

Yes, you can migrate from Varonis to Forcepoint DLP. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.

Related Comparisons & Guides