Varonis vs Digital Guardian -- Data Security & Governance Compared
Digital Guardian provides deep endpoint-level data visibility and DLP enforcement with a managed service option, while Varonis focuses on server-side data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and permission management. The two platforms protect data at different layers — Digital Guardian at the endpoint where data is used, and Varonis at the data store where data resides.
Choose Digital Guardian if you need deep endpoint-level data visibility with DLP enforcement and want the option of a fully managed DLP service. Choose Varonis if you need server-side data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and automated permission remediation across file systems, databases, and cloud storage.
| Feature | Digital Guardian | Varonis |
|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Visibility | Deep system-level data tracking | Limited endpoint monitoring |
| Data Access Governance | Not available | Full permission mapping and least privilege |
| Insider Threat Detection | Endpoint user activity monitoring | UEBA with behavioral baselines and anomaly detection |
| Managed Service | Fully managed DLP service available | Self-managed with professional services |
| DLP Enforcement | Block, warn, log at endpoint and network | Alert-based monitoring and reporting |
| Forensic Capabilities | Deep endpoint forensic data | Audit trail and access logs for investigation |
| Platform Scope | Data-centric endpoint and network DLP | Data access governance and insider threat |
| Deployment Options | Self-managed or fully managed | On-premises, cloud, hybrid |
Common questions about choosing between Varonis and Digital Guardian.
Digital Guardian provides deep endpoint-level data visibility and DLP enforcement with a managed service option, while Varonis focuses on server-side data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and permission management. The two platforms protect data at different layers — Digital Guardian at the endpoint where data is used, and Varonis at the data store where data resides.
Choose Digital Guardian if you need deep endpoint-level data visibility with DLP enforcement and want the option of a fully managed DLP service. Choose Varonis if you need server-side data access governance, insider threat detection through behavioral analytics, and automated permission remediation across file systems, databases, and cloud storage.
Digital Guardian pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Managed DLP service available. Varonis pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-TB licensing. Digital Guardian's pricing model is per-endpoint or per-user subscription, while Varonis uses subscription (per-user or per-tb) pricing.
Yes, you can migrate from Varonis to Digital Guardian. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Microsoft unified data governance and compliance platform with deep M365 integration
ComparisonData security and auditing platform for change tracking, compliance, and user behavior monitoring
ComparisonSensitive data discovery and classification platform with high-accuracy identification of regulated data
ComparisonData intelligence platform using ML for discovery, classification, and privacy management
CategoryCompare the best enterprise DLP alternatives to Varonis in 2026. Forcepoint DLP, Digital Guardian, Spirion — DLP enforcement, features, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Varonis alternatives for insider threat detection in 2026. Netwrix, Forcepoint DLP, Digital Guardian — data-centric insider threat detection compared.