SentinelOne vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint -- Endpoint & EDR Compared

SentinelOne vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and SentinelOne are both endpoint & edr solutions. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint enterprise endpoint protection deeply integrated with Microsoft 365 security stack, while SentinelOne aI-powered autonomous endpoint protection with one-click remediation. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if included with Microsoft 365 E5 licensing at no extra cost is your priority and microsoft-centric enterprises already invested in the M365 ecosystem. Choose SentinelOne if fully autonomous response reduces analyst workload matters most and organizations seeking fully autonomous EDR with minimal analyst overhead.

Used SentinelOne or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureMicrosoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne
PricingFrom $69.99/device/year (Singularity Core) / Enterprise customIncluded in Microsoft 365 E5 / Standalone from $5.20/user/month
Pricing ModelPer-device subscriptionPer-user subscription
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloudCloud
Best ForOrganizations seeking fully autonomous EDR with minimal analyst overheadMicrosoft-centric enterprises already invested in the M365 ecosystem
Attack surface reduction rulesNot availableSupported
Next-generation antivirus protectionNot availableSupported
Endpoint detection and responseNot availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint when:

  • +You value fully autonomous response reduces analyst workload
  • +You value patented Storyline technology simplifies investigations
  • +You value strong ransomware rollback capabilities
  • +You want to avoid best experience requires full Microsoft ecosystem investment
  • +You want to avoid complex licensing tiers can be confusing

Choose SentinelOne when:

  • +You value included with Microsoft 365 E5 licensing at no extra cost
  • +You value deep integration with Azure AD, Intune, and Sentinel
  • +You value rapid improvement in detection capabilities
  • +You want to avoid smaller threat intelligence dataset than CrowdStrike
  • +You want to avoid managed threat hunting (Vigilance) costs extra

Pros & Cons Comparison

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Pros

  • +Included with Microsoft 365 E5 licensing at no extra cost
  • +Deep integration with Azure AD, Intune, and Sentinel
  • +Rapid improvement in detection capabilities
  • +Broad cross-platform coverage including mobile
  • +Unified security portal across Microsoft security products

Cons

  • Best experience requires full Microsoft ecosystem investment
  • Complex licensing tiers can be confusing
  • Detection capabilities still maturing compared to CrowdStrike
  • Non-Windows platform support is less robust

SentinelOne

Pros

  • +Fully autonomous response reduces analyst workload
  • +Patented Storyline technology simplifies investigations
  • +Strong ransomware rollback capabilities
  • +Single console for endpoint, cloud, and identity
  • +Competitive pricing for comparable features

Cons

  • Smaller threat intelligence dataset than CrowdStrike
  • Managed threat hunting (Vigilance) costs extra
  • Can generate false positives with aggressive policies
  • Fewer third-party integrations in marketplace

Sources & References

  1. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. SentinelOne — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. SentinelOne Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. SentinelOne Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. SentinelOne Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Endpoint Security, Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Modern Endpoint Security 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations: Enterprise[Industry Evaluation]
  13. AV-TEST Institute: Endpoint Protection Tests[Independent Testing]
  14. SE Labs: Endpoint Protection Reports[Independent Testing]
  15. Gartner Peer Insights: EPP[Peer Reviews]

SentinelOne vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint FAQ

Common questions about choosing between SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

What is the main difference between SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and SentinelOne are both endpoint & edr solutions. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint enterprise endpoint protection deeply integrated with Microsoft 365 security stack, while SentinelOne aI-powered autonomous endpoint protection with one-click remediation. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better than SentinelOne?

Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if included with Microsoft 365 E5 licensing at no extra cost is your priority and microsoft-centric enterprises already invested in the M365 ecosystem. Choose SentinelOne if fully autonomous response reduces analyst workload matters most and organizations seeking fully autonomous EDR with minimal analyst overhead.

How much does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cost compared to SentinelOne?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing: Included in Microsoft 365 E5 / Standalone from $5.20/user/month. SentinelOne pricing: From $69.99/device/year (Singularity Core) / Enterprise custom. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's pricing model is per-user subscription, while SentinelOne uses per-device subscription pricing.

Can I migrate from SentinelOne to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Yes, you can migrate from SentinelOne to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.