Ping Identity vs OneLogin -- Enterprise IAM Compared
Ping Identity vs OneLogin
OneLogin and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. OneLogin cloud IAM platform with SmartFactor Authentication and cost-effective pricing, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose OneLogin if more affordable than Okta with comparable core SSO and MFA capabilities is your priority and mid-market organizations looking for a full-featured cloud IAM platform at a lower price point than Okta with straightforward deployment. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.
Used Ping Identity or OneLogin? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | OneLogin | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing / PingOne Essential from $3/user/month | From $4/user/month (Starter) / Advanced from $8/user/month |
| Pricing Model | Per-user subscription with tiered packages | Per-user monthly subscription |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud |
| Best For | Large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities | Mid-market organizations looking for a full-featured cloud IAM platform at a lower price point than Okta with straightforward deployment |
| Single sign-on with 6,000+ app integr... | Not available | Supported |
| SmartFactor machine learning authenti... | Not available | Supported |
| Multi-factor authentication with OTP,... | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose OneLogin when:
- +You value extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options
- +You value handles complex enterprise federation scenarios that simpler platforms cannot
- +You value strong API security capabilities beyond basic identity management
- +You want to avoid smaller integration catalog than Okta for niche SaaS applications
- +You want to avoid one Identity acquisition has slowed product innovation velocity
Choose Ping Identity when:
- +You value more affordable than Okta with comparable core SSO and MFA capabilities
- +You value smartFactor Authentication provides ML-driven risk scoring
- +You value clean, intuitive admin console with fast setup
- +You want to avoid product portfolio complexity — many separate products with overlapping capabilities
- +You want to avoid steeper learning curve than cloud-native platforms like Okta
Other Ping Identity Alternatives
Cloud identity and access management platform for SSO, MFA, and lifecycle management
Microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration
Open directory platform unifying identity, device management, and access in one console
Cisco's MFA and zero trust access platform known for ease of deployment
Enterprise identity platform with AI-driven orchestration for complex deployments
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
Developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM
Pros & Cons Comparison
OneLogin
Pros
- +More affordable than Okta with comparable core SSO and MFA capabilities
- +SmartFactor Authentication provides ML-driven risk scoring
- +Clean, intuitive admin console with fast setup
- +Strong desktop SSO for Windows and macOS endpoints
- +Sandbox environment for safe configuration testing
Cons
- –Smaller integration catalog than Okta for niche SaaS applications
- –One Identity acquisition has slowed product innovation velocity
- –Fewer advanced governance and compliance features than top-tier competitors
- –Customer support responsiveness has declined since acquisition
- –Limited CIAM capabilities — primarily a workforce identity platform
Ping Identity
Pros
- +Extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options
- +Handles complex enterprise federation scenarios that simpler platforms cannot
- +Strong API security capabilities beyond basic identity management
- +Combined Ping + ForgeRock portfolio covers the widest range of identity use cases
- +High-performance directory handles massive-scale CIAM deployments
Cons
- –Product portfolio complexity — many separate products with overlapping capabilities
- –Steeper learning curve than cloud-native platforms like Okta
- –Integration and deployment require more professional services investment
- –Ongoing Ping/ForgeRock merger creates product roadmap uncertainty
- –Cloud-native experience lags behind Okta and Entra ID for simpler use cases
Sources & References
- OneLogin — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Ping Identity — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- OneLogin Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- OneLogin Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- OneLogin Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]
Ping Identity vs OneLogin FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Ping Identity and OneLogin.
What is the main difference between Ping Identity and OneLogin?
OneLogin and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. OneLogin cloud IAM platform with SmartFactor Authentication and cost-effective pricing, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is OneLogin better than Ping Identity?
Choose OneLogin if more affordable than Okta with comparable core SSO and MFA capabilities is your priority and mid-market organizations looking for a full-featured cloud IAM platform at a lower price point than Okta with straightforward deployment. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.
How much does OneLogin cost compared to Ping Identity?
OneLogin pricing: From $4/user/month (Starter) / Advanced from $8/user/month. Ping Identity pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / PingOne Essential from $3/user/month. OneLogin's pricing model is per-user monthly subscription, while Ping Identity uses per-user subscription with tiered packages pricing.
Can I migrate from Ping Identity to OneLogin?
Yes, you can migrate from Ping Identity to OneLogin. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
OneLogin Alternatives
Cloud IAM platform with SmartFactor Authentication and cost-effective pricing
ComparisonAuth0 vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonJumpCloud vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonKeycloak vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonDuo Security vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonForgeRock vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonMicrosoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
ComparisonOkta vs Ping Identity
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security