Cisco Secure Email vs Tessian -- Enterprise Email Gateway Compared
Cisco Secure Email vs Tessian
Cisco Secure Email and Tessian are both enterprise email gateway solutions. Cisco Secure Email enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration, while Tessian human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Cisco Secure Email if strong malware detection powered by Cisco Talos threat intelligence is your priority and cisco-centric enterprises wanting email security that integrates with their existing Cisco networking and security stack. Choose Tessian if unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well matters most and organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error.
Used Cisco Secure Email or Tessian? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Tessian | Cisco Secure Email |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom pricing / per-user licensing | Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing |
| Pricing Model | Per-user subscription | Per-user subscription or appliance license |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Best For | Organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting email security that integrates with their existing Cisco networking and security stack |
| Advanced malware protection with Talo... | Not available | Supported |
| URL filtering and outbreak detection | Not available | Supported |
| Forged email detection for BEC | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Tessian when:
- +You value unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well
- +You value behavioral AI catches threats that gateway solutions miss
- +You value real-time coaching helps users make better security decisions
- +You want to avoid bEC detection significantly behind Proofpoint and Abnormal Security
- +You want to avoid administration interface feels dated and complex
Choose Cisco Secure Email when:
- +You value strong malware detection powered by Cisco Talos threat intelligence
- +You value deep integration with Cisco SecureX and broader Cisco security stack
- +You value flexible deployment options including on-premises appliance
- +You want to avoid now part of Proofpoint — future as standalone product uncertain
- +You want to avoid not a full email gateway replacement
Other Cisco Secure Email Alternatives
Enterprise email security platform for advanced threat protection, compliance, and data loss prevention
Cloud email security platform with threat protection, archiving, and continuity
Microsoft's native email security for Microsoft 365 with XDR integration
AI-powered email security platform specializing in behavioral detection of social engineering attacks
Email threat protection platform available as gateway appliance or cloud service
Cloud email security gateway with AI-powered BEC detection and XDR integration
AI-powered anti-phishing platform with crowdsourced threat intelligence
Pros & Cons Comparison
Tessian
Pros
- +Unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well
- +Behavioral AI catches threats that gateway solutions miss
- +Real-time coaching helps users make better security decisions
- +Prevents both intentional exfiltration and accidental data loss
- +API-based deployment with no MX record changes required
Cons
- –Now part of Proofpoint — future as standalone product uncertain
- –Not a full email gateway replacement
- –Narrower threat coverage than comprehensive email security platforms
- –Behavioral models require learning period to reduce initial false positives
- –No email archiving or compliance capabilities
Cisco Secure Email
Pros
- +Strong malware detection powered by Cisco Talos threat intelligence
- +Deep integration with Cisco SecureX and broader Cisco security stack
- +Flexible deployment options including on-premises appliance
- +Reliable email gateway with long enterprise track record
- +Graymail management reduces user complaints about bulk email
Cons
- –BEC detection significantly behind Proofpoint and Abnormal Security
- –Administration interface feels dated and complex
- –Innovation pace slower than cloud-native email security vendors
- –Best value only realized within broader Cisco security ecosystem
- –Cloud-native capabilities less mature than born-in-cloud competitors
Sources & References
- Cisco Secure Email — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Tessian — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Cisco Secure Email Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Email Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Email Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Email Security 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Enterprise Email Security, Q2 2024[Analyst Report]
- SE Labs: Email Security Gateway Tests[Independent Testing]
- Anti-Phishing Working Group: Phishing Activity Trends[Industry Research]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Email Security[Peer Reviews]
Cisco Secure Email vs Tessian FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Cisco Secure Email and Tessian.
What is the main difference between Cisco Secure Email and Tessian?
Cisco Secure Email and Tessian are both enterprise email gateway solutions. Cisco Secure Email enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration, while Tessian human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Tessian better than Cisco Secure Email?
Choose Cisco Secure Email if strong malware detection powered by Cisco Talos threat intelligence is your priority and cisco-centric enterprises wanting email security that integrates with their existing Cisco networking and security stack. Choose Tessian if unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well matters most and organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error.
How much does Tessian cost compared to Cisco Secure Email?
Tessian pricing: Custom pricing / per-user licensing. Cisco Secure Email pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / per-user licensing. Tessian's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Cisco Secure Email uses per-user subscription or appliance license pricing.
Can I migrate from Cisco Secure Email to Tessian?
Yes, you can migrate from Cisco Secure Email to Tessian. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Tessian Alternatives
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonAbnormal Security vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonBarracuda Email Security vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonIRONSCALES vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonProofpoint vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonMimecast vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
ComparisonTessian vs Cisco Secure Email
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration