Cisco Secure Access vs Netskope -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared
Cisco Secure Access vs Netskope
Cisco Secure Access and Netskope are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cisco Secure Access cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security, while Netskope cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Cisco Secure Access if cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team is your priority and large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform. Choose Netskope if industry-leading CASB with the deepest SaaS app visibility and activity-level controls matters most and organizations that need the deepest SaaS visibility and granular cloud application control alongside SASE capabilities.
Used Cisco Secure Access or Netskope? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Netskope | Cisco Secure Access |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user subscription | Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user bundled subscription |
| Pricing Model | Per-user annual subscription | Per-user annual subscription with bundled tiers |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Best For | Organizations that need the deepest SaaS visibility and granular cloud application control alongside SASE capabilities | Large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform |
| Umbrella DNS security and SWG | Not available | Supported |
| Duo zero trust access and MFA | Not available | Supported |
| Meraki SD-WAN integration | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Netskope when:
- +You value industry-leading CASB with the deepest SaaS app visibility and activity-level controls
- +You value newEdge network provides fast, full-compute security in 70+ regions
- +You value superior data protection with advanced DLP, exact data match, and fingerprinting
- +You want to avoid platform still maturing — recently converged from separate Umbrella, Duo, and AnyConnect products
- +You want to avoid integration between acquired components can be inconsistent
Choose Cisco Secure Access when:
- +You value cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team
- +You value unified platform for organizations already invested in Cisco networking and security
- +You value duo provides the most established zero trust MFA and access solution in the market
- +You want to avoid premium pricing comparable to Zscaler, difficult for mid-market budgets
- +You want to avoid sD-WAN capabilities less mature than dedicated SD-WAN vendors
Other Cisco Secure Access Alternatives
Cloud-native SASE and zero trust platform for secure internet and private application access
Developer-friendly zero trust platform built on Cloudflare's global Anycast network
Enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security
Converged SASE platform powered by FortiOS with competitive pricing and integrated SD-WAN
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
Cloud-native zero trust platform with FedRAMP authorization and competitive mid-market pricing
Pros & Cons Comparison
Netskope
Pros
- +Strong CASB with the deepest SaaS app visibility and activity-level controls
- +NewEdge network provides fast, full-compute security in 70+ regions
- +Superior data protection with advanced DLP, exact data match, and fingerprinting
- +Strong UEBA detects insider threats and compromised accounts
- +Excellent API-based CASB for SaaS posture management and compliance
Cons
- –Premium pricing comparable to Zscaler, difficult for mid-market budgets
- –SD-WAN capabilities less mature than dedicated SD-WAN vendors
- –Smaller global PoP footprint than Zscaler (70+ vs 150+)
- –Complex licensing tiers make it hard to predict total cost
- –Private access (ZTNA) features are less proven than ZPA at large scale
Cisco Secure Access
Pros
- +Cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team
- +Unified platform for organizations already invested in Cisco networking and security
- +Duo provides the most established zero trust MFA and access solution in the market
- +Meraki SD-WAN integration for branch office connectivity
- +ThousandEyes provides industry-leading digital experience monitoring
Cons
- –Platform still maturing — recently converged from separate Umbrella, Duo, and AnyConnect products
- –Integration between acquired components can be inconsistent
- –Cloud-native SASE capabilities lag behind Zscaler and Netskope
- –Complex licensing with multiple SKUs inherited from different product lines
- –Inline inspection and SSL decryption less performant than purpose-built cloud proxies
Sources & References
- Cisco Secure Access — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Netskope — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Netskope Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Netskope Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Netskope Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Single-Vendor SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Zero Trust Network Access, Q3 2023[Analyst Report]
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model[Government Standard]
- Gartner Peer Insights: SSE[Peer Reviews]
Cisco Secure Access vs Netskope FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Cisco Secure Access and Netskope.
What is the main difference between Cisco Secure Access and Netskope?
Cisco Secure Access and Netskope are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cisco Secure Access cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security, while Netskope cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Netskope better than Cisco Secure Access?
Choose Cisco Secure Access if cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team is your priority and large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform. Choose Netskope if industry-leading CASB with the deepest SaaS app visibility and activity-level controls matters most and organizations that need the deepest SaaS visibility and granular cloud application control alongside SASE capabilities.
How much does Netskope cost compared to Cisco Secure Access?
Netskope pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user subscription. Cisco Secure Access pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user bundled subscription. Netskope's pricing model is per-user annual subscription, while Cisco Secure Access uses per-user annual subscription with bundled tiers pricing.
Can I migrate from Cisco Secure Access to Netskope?
Yes, you can migrate from Cisco Secure Access to Netskope. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Netskope Alternatives
Cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility
ComparisonCato Networks vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonCloudflare Zero Trust vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
Comparisoniboss vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonFortinet FortiSASE vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonPalo Alto Prisma Access vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonSkyhigh Security vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonNetskope vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security