BeyondTrust vs CyberArk -- PAM & Identity Compared
BeyondTrust vs CyberArk
BeyondTrust competes directly with CyberArk in the enterprise PAM space, offering a strong combination of privileged access management and endpoint privilege management. While CyberArk has deeper PAM heritage and broader identity security features, BeyondTrust differentiates with its integrated secure remote access and endpoint privilege management capabilities.
Last updated
The Verdict
BeyondTrust is the strongest alternative to CyberArk for organizations that prioritize endpoint privilege management and third-party remote access alongside traditional PAM. CyberArk remains the choice for those needing the broadest identity security platform and deepest PAM maturity.
Used BeyondTrust or CyberArk? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | CyberArk | BeyondTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Credential Vaulting | Strong vault with auto-rotation | Industry-leading Digital Vault |
| Endpoint Privilege Management | Built-in EPM with granular controls | Available as separate EPM module |
| Secure Remote Access | Integrated PRA solution | Vendor Privileged Access Manager |
| Session Monitoring | Full session recording and audit | Comprehensive PSM with keystroke logging |
| Secrets Management | Basic secrets capabilities | Full-featured Conjur platform |
| Cloud PAM | Cloud-based management console | CyberArk Privilege Cloud |
| Threat Analytics | Privileged threat analytics module | Advanced threat detection with ML |
| Identity Governance | Limited identity governance | Comprehensive identity security platform |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose CyberArk when:
- +You need integrated endpoint privilege management alongside PAM
- +Secure remote access for third-party vendors is a primary requirement
- +You want a more unified platform rather than separate modules
- +Least privilege enforcement on endpoints is a top priority
- +You prefer a single vendor for PAM and remote access
Choose BeyondTrust when:
- +You need the deepest and most mature PAM capabilities available
- +Identity governance and cloud entitlements are part of your requirements
- +You operate in highly regulated industries requiring proven compliance
- +You need secrets management integrated with PAM (Conjur)
- +Your environment requires the broadest integration ecosystem
Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure
We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency
Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency
- +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
- +Secrets never leave your environment
- +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
- –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
- –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
- –Newer platform with smaller market presence
Other BeyondTrust Alternatives
Cloud-ready PAM platform built on Secret Server and privilege management
Unified identity security platform with PAM and governance
Open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform
People-first infrastructure access platform with full audit logging
Open-source identity-based access management for dynamic infrastructure
AI-driven identity governance and administration platform
Affordable full-featured privileged access management solution
Pros & Cons Comparison
CyberArk
Pros
- +Strong PAM solution
- +Comprehensive privilege management
- +Strong compliance and audit capabilities
- +Deep enterprise integration ecosystem
- +Proven in highly regulated industries
Cons
- –Complex deployment and configuration
- –Expensive licensing model
- –Steep learning curve for administrators
- –Legacy architecture in some components
- –Long implementation timelines
BeyondTrust
Pros
- +Strong endpoint privilege management capabilities
- +Unified platform for PAM and remote access
- +Good vendor/third-party access controls
- +Comprehensive audit and compliance reporting
- +Active Directory integration depth
Cons
- –Complex initial deployment
- –Premium pricing for full platform
- –UI can feel dated in some modules
- –Integration between acquired products can be uneven
Sources & References
- CyberArk — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- BeyondTrust — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- CyberArk Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- BeyondTrust Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- BeyondTrust Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- BeyondTrust Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Privileged Identity Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: PAM 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Peer Insights: PAM[Peer Reviews]
BeyondTrust vs CyberArk FAQ
Common questions about choosing between BeyondTrust and CyberArk.
What is the main difference between BeyondTrust and CyberArk?
BeyondTrust competes directly with CyberArk in the enterprise PAM space, offering a strong combination of privileged access management and endpoint privilege management. While CyberArk has deeper PAM heritage and broader identity security features, BeyondTrust differentiates with its integrated secure remote access and endpoint privilege management capabilities.
Is CyberArk better than BeyondTrust?
BeyondTrust is the strongest alternative to CyberArk for organizations that prioritize endpoint privilege management and third-party remote access alongside traditional PAM. CyberArk remains the choice for those needing the broadest identity security platform and deepest PAM maturity.
How much does CyberArk cost compared to BeyondTrust?
CyberArk pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / From $2/user/month (basic). BeyondTrust pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. CyberArk's pricing model is per-user subscription + modules, while BeyondTrust uses per-user subscription + modules pricing.
Can I migrate from BeyondTrust to CyberArk?
Yes, you can migrate from BeyondTrust to CyberArk. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
CyberArk Alternatives
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonCyberArk vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonHashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonManageEngine PAM360 vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonDelinea vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonSailPoint vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonOne Identity vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonTeleport vs BeyondTrust
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform