Privileged Access Management · Head-to-Head

Teleport vs ManageEngine PAM360

ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport are both pam & identity solutions. ManageEngine PAM360 affordable full-featured privileged access management solution, while Teleport open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 if significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions is your priority and mid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point. Choose Teleport if open-source with transparent security model matters most and engineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure access.

Tried Teleport or ManageEngine PAM360? Drop a quick rating.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureManageEngine PAM360Teleport
PricingFree (Community) / From $20/resource/month (Enterprise)From $7,995/year (2 admins)
Pricing ModelPer-resource subscriptionPer-admin annual license
Open SourceYesNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForEngineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure accessMid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point
Privileged password vaultingNot availableSupported
Privileged session monitoring and rec...Not availableSupported
SSL certificate managementNot availableSupported
Compliance
SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001GDPR
SOC 2 Type 2FedRAMP ModerateISO 27001

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 when:

  • +You value open-source with transparent security model
  • +You value modern, developer-friendly experience
  • +You value no standing credentials or VPNs required
  • +You want to avoid less scalable for very large enterprises
  • +You want to avoid limited advanced analytics and threat detection

Choose Teleport when:

  • +You value significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions
  • +You value straightforward deployment and management
  • +You value good feature coverage for the price point
  • +You want to avoid less mature in traditional PAM use cases
  • +You want to avoid smaller enterprise feature set than CyberArk

Also Worth Considering: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

Why SplitSecure? Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted

Pros & Cons Comparison

ManageEngine PAM360

Pros

  • +Significantly cheaper than enterprise competitors
  • +Solid feature coverage for mid-market PAM needs
  • +Strong bundle value if you already use ManageEngine tools
  • +Perpetual licensing still available

Cons

  • UI and admin experience feel dated
  • Fewer integrations with modern DevOps tooling
  • Support quality can be inconsistent
  • Less suitable for highly complex enterprise estates

Teleport

Pros

  • +Excellent developer experience; cloud-native design
  • +Open source core with strong enterprise tier
  • +Short-lived certs eliminate shared credentials and password sprawl
  • +Broad protocol support (SSH, K8s, DB, apps) in one tool

Cons

  • Enterprise features require the paid tier
  • Complex to operate at scale without dedicated SREs
  • Self-hosted HA setup requires Postgres/etcd expertise
  • Smaller integration catalog than legacy PAM vendors

Sources & References

  1. ManageEngine PAM360 — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Teleport — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Teleport Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Teleport Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Teleport Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Privileged Identity Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
  11. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: PAM 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Gartner Peer Insights: PAM[Peer Reviews]

Teleport vs ManageEngine PAM360 FAQ

Quick answers for teams evaluating Teleport vs ManageEngine PAM360.

What is the main difference between Teleport and ManageEngine PAM360?

ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport are both pam & identity solutions. ManageEngine PAM360 affordable full-featured privileged access management solution, while Teleport open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is ManageEngine PAM360 better than Teleport?

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 if significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions is your priority and mid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point. Choose Teleport if open-source with transparent security model matters most and engineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure access.

How much does ManageEngine PAM360 cost compared to Teleport?

ManageEngine PAM360 starts at From ~$7,000/year for 10 admins (published perpetual and subscription options) (per-admin tiers + perpetual license option). Teleport starts at Community Edition free; Team from $15/user/mo; Enterprise custom (open source + per-user tiers). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.

Can I migrate from Teleport to ManageEngine PAM360?

It depends on how deeply Teleport is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether ManageEngine PAM360 supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.