Palo Alto Networks vs Cisco Firepower -- Firewall & NGFW Compared
Cisco Firepower competes with Palo Alto Networks as an enterprise NGFW platform, with its strongest differentiator being deep integration with Cisco's networking infrastructure and the Talos threat intelligence team. Palo Alto consistently outperforms Cisco in independent NGFW testing, management experience, and pure security efficacy, but Cisco is the natural choice for organizations already invested in Cisco networking that want unified network and security management.
Choose Cisco Firepower if your organization is deeply invested in Cisco networking and wants unified infrastructure management, or if you need specialized capabilities like Encrypted Visibility Engine and Snort 3 customization. Choose Palo Alto Networks if security efficacy, management experience, and application visibility are your primary decision criteria.
| Feature | Cisco Firepower | Palo Alto Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Threat Prevention | Talos-powered with Snort 3 IPS — strong but behind PA in testing | Industry-leading efficacy with top independent test scores |
| Management | FMC — powerful but complex and unintuitive | Panorama — streamlined centralized management |
| Encrypted Traffic | Encrypted Visibility Engine — classifies without decryption | Full SSL/TLS decryption and inspection |
| Network Integration | Deep integration with Cisco switches, routers, and ISE | Vendor-agnostic — integrates with any network infrastructure |
| IPS Engine | Snort 3 — highly customizable open-source based | Proprietary IPS with automated signature updates |
| Application Control | AVC — adequate application identification | App-ID — granular application classification and control |
| Cloud Firewall | Secure Firewall Cloud Native for AWS/Azure | VM-Series and CN-Series for all major clouds and Kubernetes |
| Platform Maturity | Evolved from ASA — some legacy complexity remains | Built as NGFW from inception — cohesive architecture |
Common questions about choosing between Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Firepower.
Cisco Firepower competes with Palo Alto Networks as an enterprise NGFW platform, with its strongest differentiator being deep integration with Cisco's networking infrastructure and the Talos threat intelligence team. Palo Alto consistently outperforms Cisco in independent NGFW testing, management experience, and pure security efficacy, but Cisco is the natural choice for organizations already invested in Cisco networking that want unified network and security management.
Choose Cisco Firepower if your organization is deeply invested in Cisco networking and wants unified infrastructure management, or if you need specialized capabilities like Encrypted Visibility Engine and Snort 3 customization. Choose Palo Alto Networks if security efficacy, management experience, and application visibility are your primary decision criteria.
Cisco Firepower pricing: Hardware from ~$2,000 (Firepower 1010) to $300,000+ (Firepower 9300) / Threat license, Malware license, URL Filtering license sold separately / Smart Licensing model. Palo Alto Networks pricing: Hardware appliances from ~$3,000 (PA-400) to $200,000+ (PA-7000 series) / VM-Series from ~$2,500/yr / Subscription licenses for Threat Prevention, WildFire, URL Filtering, DNS Security sold separately. Cisco Firepower's pricing model is appliance purchase + annual per-feature subscription licenses, while Palo Alto Networks uses appliance purchase + annual subscription licenses per feature pricing.
Yes, you can migrate from Palo Alto Networks to Cisco Firepower. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Integrated network security platform with ASIC-accelerated performance and Security Fabric ecosystem
ComparisonEnterprise network security gateway with ThreatCloud AI intelligence and Maestro hyperscale orchestration
ComparisonHigh-performance security gateway with advanced routing and Junos OS networking heritage
ComparisonSynchronized security firewall with endpoint integration, Xstream TLS inspection, and cloud management
CategoryCompare the best enterprise NGFW alternatives to Palo Alto Networks in 2026. Fortinet FortiGate, Check Point Quantum, Cisco Firepower — features, performance, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Palo Alto Networks alternatives for network perimeter security in 2026. Fortinet FortiGate, Check Point Quantum, Cisco Firepower, pfSense — perimeter defense compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Palo Alto Networks alternatives for cloud workload firewall in 2026. Barracuda CloudGen, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower, Juniper vSRX — cloud firewall compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Palo Alto Networks alternatives for microsegmentation in 2026. Check Point Quantum, Cisco Firepower, Sophos XGS, Fortinet FortiGate — east-west security compared.