CyberArk vs Teleport -- PAM & Identity Compared
Teleport takes a fundamentally different approach from CyberArk by providing identity-based, zero-trust access to infrastructure without traditional credential vaulting. While CyberArk excels in comprehensive PAM for regulated enterprises, Teleport appeals to cloud-native organizations that want to eliminate standing credentials entirely and provide developers with seamless access.
Teleport is the top alternative for cloud-native and engineering-driven organizations that want modern, zero-trust infrastructure access without traditional PAM complexity. CyberArk remains essential for enterprises needing comprehensive credential management, deep compliance, and broad identity governance.
| Feature | Teleport | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Access Model | Certificate-based zero-trust | Credential vaulting and checkout |
| SSH Access | Native SSH with short-lived certs | PSM proxy-based SSH sessions |
| Kubernetes Access | Native K8s RBAC integration | K8s access via Conjur and PAM |
| Database Access | Direct DB access with auto-auth | Database credential management |
| Session Recording | Built-in session recording | Advanced PSM recording and replay |
| Deployment | Minutes to deploy, single binary | Weeks to months for full deployment |
| Open Source | Apache 2.0 licensed core | Proprietary closed-source |
| Identity Governance | Basic RBAC and access requests | Full identity security platform |
Common questions about choosing between CyberArk and Teleport.
Teleport takes a fundamentally different approach from CyberArk by providing identity-based, zero-trust access to infrastructure without traditional credential vaulting. While CyberArk excels in comprehensive PAM for regulated enterprises, Teleport appeals to cloud-native organizations that want to eliminate standing credentials entirely and provide developers with seamless access.
Teleport is the top alternative for cloud-native and engineering-driven organizations that want modern, zero-trust infrastructure access without traditional PAM complexity. CyberArk remains essential for enterprises needing comprehensive credential management, deep compliance, and broad identity governance.
Teleport pricing: Free (Community) / From $20/resource/month (Enterprise). CyberArk pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / From $2/user/month (basic). Teleport's pricing model is per-resource subscription, while CyberArk uses per-user subscription + modules pricing.
Yes, you can migrate from CyberArk to Teleport. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
ComparisonCloud-ready PAM platform built on Secret Server and privilege management
ComparisonUnified identity security platform with PAM and governance
ComparisonPeople-first infrastructure access platform with full audit logging
CategoryCompare modern PAM alternatives to CyberArk including Teleport, StrongDM, and HashiCorp Boundary. Zero-trust, identity-based infrastructure access for cloud-native teams.
Use CaseCompare the best privileged access management alternatives to CyberArk. Comprehensive PAM tools for credential vaulting, session management, and compliance.
Use CaseCompare zero trust access alternatives to CyberArk. Modern platforms for identity-based, least-privilege access to infrastructure and applications.
Use CaseCompare remote infrastructure access alternatives to CyberArk. Modern tools for secure SSH, database, Kubernetes, and cloud access without VPNs.