Cato Networks vs Skyhigh Security

Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cato Networks single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Choose Cato Networks if true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions is your priority and mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.

Skyhigh Security starts at Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers (per-user annual subscription). Cato Networks starts at Custom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth (per-site and per-user annual subscription). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.

It depends on how deeply Cato Networks is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether Skyhigh Security supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.