Cloud SIEM Platforms -- Splunk Alternatives
Cloud SIEM platforms deliver security analytics as a fully managed service, eliminating the infrastructure management burden that makes Splunk operationally expensive. These platforms scale automatically, require no hardware provisioning, and often integrate tightly with cloud provider ecosystems. They are ideal for organizations that want enterprise SIEM capabilities without dedicated infrastructure teams and are operating primarily in cloud environments.
From $2.46/GB ingested (pay-as-you-go) / Commitment tiers available
The strongest choice for Microsoft-centric organizations, offering free ingestion of M365 and Azure logs, built-in SOAR with Logic Apps, and AI-powered detection. Delivers exceptional value when your environment is already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.
From $0.20/GB analyzed (Cloud SIEM) / Custom enterprise
The best option for DevSecOps teams that want security and observability in one platform. Ideal for cloud-native and containerized environments where correlating security events with infrastructure metrics provides faster incident response.
From $3.00/GB/day (Cloud Flex) / Enterprise custom
A strong cloud-native SIEM with transparent per-GB pricing and built-in Cloud SOAR. Best for teams that want straightforward SaaS deployment with unified security and observability analytics without managing any infrastructure.
Cloud-native SIEM and security analytics with automated threat detection
From $3.00/GB/day (Cloud Flex) / Enterprise custom
Organizations wanting a fully managed cloud SIEM with predictable pricing and no infrastructure to manage
Unified security and observability platform with cloud SIEM and posture management
From $0.20/GB analyzed (Cloud SIEM) / Custom enterprise
DevSecOps teams that want unified security and observability with deep cloud-native visibility
Cloud-native Azure SIEM with AI-powered detection and automated response
From $2.46/GB ingested (pay-as-you-go) / Commitment tiers available
Microsoft-centric organizations wanting a cloud-native SIEM with deep M365 and Azure integration
Compare all 3 Splunk alternatives side-by-side across pricing, deployment, and key capabilities.
| Feature | Sumo Logic 4.3/5 | Datadog Security 4.4/5 | Microsoft Sentinel 4.4/5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Ingest-based (per GB/day) | Per-GB analyzed + per-host for additional modules | Per-GB ingested (with commitment tier discounts) |
| Open Source | -- | -- | -- |
| Cloud-Hosted | + | + | + |
| Self-Hosted | -- | -- | -- |
| Best For | Organizations wanting a fully managed cloud SIEM with predictable pricing and no infrastructure to manage | DevSecOps teams that want unified security and observability with deep cloud-native visibility | Microsoft-centric organizations wanting a cloud-native SIEM with deep M365 and Azure integration |
| Key Features |
|
|
|
| Website | Visit | Visit | Visit |
Cloud SIEMs eliminate infrastructure provisioning, capacity planning, patch management, and upgrade cycles that consume significant operational resources with on-premises Splunk. They scale automatically to handle data spikes, provide built-in high availability, and typically offer faster time-to-value. Many cloud SIEMs also provide consumption-based pricing that can be more cost-effective for organizations with variable data volumes.
For Microsoft-centric organizations, Sentinel can be significantly cheaper. Microsoft 365 and Azure activity logs are ingested for free, which eliminates a major cost component. Third-party data ingestion costs $2.46/GB on pay-as-you-go, with commitment tiers reducing this further. However, costs can escalate quickly with large volumes of non-Microsoft data. Organizations report 30-60% savings compared to Splunk when most of their data comes from Microsoft sources.
Datadog Security is maturing rapidly but is still less feature-complete than Splunk as a standalone SIEM. It excels when security monitoring is combined with infrastructure and application observability, particularly in cloud-native environments. For organizations that need advanced correlation rules, extensive threat hunting, SOAR workflows, and the broadest integration ecosystem, Splunk remains the more capable choice. Datadog is best when unified security-observability context is more valuable than pure SIEM depth.
Start by measuring your daily data ingest volume in GB, then compare against each platform's pricing tiers. Factor in free data sources (e.g., Sentinel's free Microsoft log ingestion), commitment tier discounts, and the cost of any add-on modules. Also account for the operational cost savings from eliminating infrastructure management. Most organizations find that cloud SIEMs are 20-50% less expensive than Splunk at equivalent data volumes, with savings increasing for Microsoft-heavy environments using Sentinel.
Cloud-native SIEM and security analytics with automated threat detection
ComparisonUnified security and observability platform with cloud SIEM and posture management
ComparisonCloud-native Azure SIEM with AI-powered detection and automated response
CategoryCompare the best open source SIEM alternatives to Splunk in 2026. Elastic Security, Graylog and more — features, detection capabilities, and deployment compared.
CategoryCompare the best enterprise SIEM alternatives to Splunk in 2026. IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Exabeam — threat detection, UEBA, SOAR, and pricing compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Splunk alternatives for SOC operations in 2026. Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic Security, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm — SOC features and workflows compared.
Use CaseCompare the best Splunk alternatives for threat detection in 2026. Exabeam, Elastic Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar, Datadog Security — detection capabilities compared.