Akeyless vs SplitSecure -- Secrets Management Compared

Akeyless vs SplitSecure

SplitSecure distributes secrets across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing, eliminating vendor dependency entirely. While Akeyless provides a SaaS vault with DFC encryption, SplitSecure ensures your credentials never touch any third-party server — making it ideal for highest-sensitivity accounts and regulated industries.

The Verdict

Choose SplitSecure for your highest-sensitivity accounts where vendor independence and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. Choose Akeyless for DevOps-heavy environments with CI/CD pipelines. Many organizations benefit from using both — Akeyless for operational secrets and SplitSecure for the accounts that represent catastrophic risk.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureSplitSecureAkeyless
ArchitectureDistributed across devices (no vault)SaaS vault + customer gateway
Vendor DependencyNone — secrets exist independentlyRequires Akeyless platform uptime
Secret LocationFragments on your devices onlyFragments in Akeyless cloud
InfrastructureMinimal — auditing service onlyGateway deployment required
CryptographyShamir Secret SharingDistributed Fragments Cryptography
Audit TrailAutomatic — built into architectureConfigurable audit logging
Best ForHighest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industriesDevOps teams, CI/CD pipelines
CI/CD IntegrationNot designed for pipelinesGitHub Actions, Jenkins, Terraform

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose SplitSecure when:

  • +You need secrets that function independently of any third-party platform
  • +You are in a regulated industry subject to DORA, NYDFS, PCI DSS 4.0, or SOX
  • +You want zero vendor dependency for your most critical credentials
  • +You are an MSP who cannot risk client credential exposure
  • +You need cryptographic separation of duties resistant to social engineering

Choose Akeyless when:

  • +You need machine-to-machine secrets for CI/CD pipelines
  • +You want integrations with GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Terraform, and Kubernetes
  • +You need dynamic secrets generation for databases and cloud providers
  • +You want a single platform for thousands of operational secrets
  • +You need built-in secure remote access (SSH, RDP)

Pros & Cons Comparison

SplitSecure

Pros

  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
  • +Built-in compliance for DORA, NYDFS, PCI DSS 4.0, SOX
  • +Minimal infrastructure — no vault, no gateway, no cluster

Cons

  • Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • Newer platform with smaller market presence
  • Best suited for highest-sensitivity accounts rather than all secrets

Akeyless

Pros

  • +Zero-knowledge SaaS architecture
  • +No infrastructure to manage
  • +Built-in secure remote access
  • +Fast time-to-value and easy onboarding
  • +Multi-cloud out of the box

Cons

  • Proprietary and closed-source
  • Custom pricing lacks transparency
  • Smaller community than open-source tools
  • Vendor lock-in with proprietary DFC
  • Fewer third-party integrations than Vault

Akeyless vs SplitSecure FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Akeyless and SplitSecure.

What is the main difference between Akeyless and SplitSecure?

SplitSecure distributes secrets across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing, eliminating vendor dependency entirely. While Akeyless provides a SaaS vault with DFC encryption, SplitSecure ensures your credentials never touch any third-party server — making it ideal for highest-sensitivity accounts and regulated industries.

Is SplitSecure better than Akeyless?

Choose SplitSecure for your highest-sensitivity accounts where vendor independence and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. Choose Akeyless for DevOps-heavy environments with CI/CD pipelines. Many organizations benefit from using both — Akeyless for operational secrets and SplitSecure for the accounts that represent catastrophic risk.

How much does SplitSecure cost compared to Akeyless?

SplitSecure pricing: Contact for pricing. Akeyless pricing: Custom pricing / Free community tier. SplitSecure's pricing model is custom, while Akeyless uses custom enterprise pricing.

Can I migrate from Akeyless to SplitSecure?

Yes, you can migrate from Akeyless to SplitSecure. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.

Related Comparisons & Guides