Akeyless vs CyberArk Conjur -- Secrets Management Compared

Akeyless vs CyberArk Conjur

CyberArk Conjur is the enterprise heavyweight with policy-as-code and deep PAM integration. Akeyless is lighter and faster to deploy but lacks Conjur's enterprise compliance depth and CyberArk ecosystem.

The Verdict

Choose CyberArk Conjur if you need enterprise-grade compliance, policy-as-code, and deep PAM integration. Choose Akeyless if you want a lighter, faster-to-deploy SaaS solution with built-in secure remote access.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureCyberArk ConjurAkeyless
Access ControlPolicy-as-codeRBAC with policies
PAM IntegrationFull CyberArk ecosystemBasic PAM features
Machine IdentityCore focus areaSupported
Open SourceYes (community edition)No
DeploymentSelf-hosted or cloudSaaS with gateway
ComplianceEnterprise-gradeStandard compliance
Setup ComplexityHighLow — SaaS onboarding
PricingFree OSS / Enterprise customCustom pricing

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose CyberArk Conjur when:

  • +You have complex enterprise compliance requirements
  • +You need policy-as-code governance
  • +You want to integrate with CyberArk's PAM ecosystem
  • +You need machine identity management at scale
  • +You require an open-source community edition

Choose Akeyless when:

  • +You want faster deployment and simpler operations
  • +You don't need the full CyberArk PAM ecosystem
  • +You prefer SaaS over self-managed infrastructure
  • +You need built-in secure remote access
  • +Your compliance needs are moderate

Pros & Cons Comparison

CyberArk Conjur

Pros

  • +Enterprise-grade security
  • +Open-source community edition
  • +Strong compliance support
  • +Deep DevOps toolchain integration

Cons

  • Complex setup and configuration
  • Enterprise pricing can be high
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Requires CyberArk ecosystem for full value

Akeyless

Pros

  • +Zero-knowledge SaaS architecture
  • +No infrastructure to manage
  • +Built-in secure remote access
  • +Fast time-to-value and easy onboarding
  • +Multi-cloud out of the box

Cons

  • Proprietary and closed-source
  • Custom pricing lacks transparency
  • Smaller community than open-source tools
  • Vendor lock-in with proprietary DFC
  • Fewer third-party integrations than Vault

Akeyless vs CyberArk Conjur FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Akeyless and CyberArk Conjur.

What is the main difference between Akeyless and CyberArk Conjur?

CyberArk Conjur is the enterprise heavyweight with policy-as-code and deep PAM integration. Akeyless is lighter and faster to deploy but lacks Conjur's enterprise compliance depth and CyberArk ecosystem.

Is CyberArk Conjur better than Akeyless?

Choose CyberArk Conjur if you need enterprise-grade compliance, policy-as-code, and deep PAM integration. Choose Akeyless if you want a lighter, faster-to-deploy SaaS solution with built-in secure remote access.

How much does CyberArk Conjur cost compared to Akeyless?

CyberArk Conjur pricing: Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request. Akeyless pricing: Custom pricing / Free community tier. CyberArk Conjur's pricing model is enterprise license, while Akeyless uses custom enterprise pricing.

Can I migrate from Akeyless to CyberArk Conjur?

Yes, you can migrate from Akeyless to CyberArk Conjur. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.

Related Comparisons & Guides